https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306269 The Supreme Court held that the review petitions were not maintainable as no new and important evidence or error apparent on the face of the record was presented. The Court found that successive review petitions without new grounds were impermissible. Additionally, the surrender proceedings of protected tenancy rights were deemed invalid due to manipulation. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the judgment, and restored the original order, concluding that the review petitions constituted an abuse of process. Each party was ordered to bear their own expenses. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306269 The Supreme Court held that the review petitions were not maintainable as no new and important evidence or error apparent on the face of the record was presented. The Court found that successive review petitions without new grounds were impermissible. Additionally, the surrender proceedings of protected tenancy rights were deemed invalid due to manipulation. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the judgment, and restored the original order, concluding that the review petitions constituted an abuse of process. Each party was ordered to bear their own expenses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306269