<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 203 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal in a case involving a dispute over the quantity of Heavy Melting Scrap received by the appellant. The vessel was seized due to mis-declaration and undervaluation, with the appellants failing to verify the actual quantity discharged. The Tribunal upheld the duty payment demand, emphasizing compliance with documentation requirements and the need for due diligence in verifying quantities before filing entries. The decision was pronounced on 27-5-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 203 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal in a case involving a dispute over the quantity of Heavy Melting Scrap received by the appellant. The vessel was seized due to mis-declaration and undervaluation, with the appellants failing to verify the actual quantity discharged. The Tribunal upheld the duty payment demand, emphasizing compliance with documentation requirements and the need for due diligence in verifying quantities before filing entries. The decision was pronounced on 27-5-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>