<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306239</link>
    <description>A notification under Section 4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, triggered statutory abatement under Section 5(2)(a), so the suit and all proceedings arising from it ceased to continue. The statutory scheme was applied to pending appeals as well, including appeals before the Supreme Court, and the parties were directed to pursue their rights before the consolidation authorities. The suit and the appeal therefore stood abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306239</link>
      <description>A notification under Section 4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, triggered statutory abatement under Section 5(2)(a), so the suit and all proceedings arising from it ceased to continue. The statutory scheme was applied to pending appeals as well, including appeals before the Supreme Court, and the parties were directed to pursue their rights before the consolidation authorities. The suit and the appeal therefore stood abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>