<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 733 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432986</link>
    <description>HC dismissed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging goods detention and tax deposit under GST Act. Court noted that an order was already passed under Section 129(3), and petitioner had appellate remedies available. Since no valid grounds existed to challenge the proceedings and the order remained operative, the petition was dismissed without further relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 733 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432986</link>
      <description>HC dismissed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging goods detention and tax deposit under GST Act. Court noted that an order was already passed under Section 129(3), and petitioner had appellate remedies available. Since no valid grounds existed to challenge the proceedings and the order remained operative, the petition was dismissed without further relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>