<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 707 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, primarily due to the incorrect application of sections 68 and 69A, flawed limited scrutiny, and violation of CBDT instructions. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures, leading to the quashing of the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 707 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, primarily due to the incorrect application of sections 68 and 69A, flawed limited scrutiny, and violation of CBDT instructions. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures, leading to the quashing of the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>