https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432950 The Court found that the suspension of the Importer Exporter Code (IEC) without proper procedure violated Section 8 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act. While the initial notice lacked specificity on grounds for suspension, a subsequent notice outlined the violations clearly. The Court directed the restoration of the petitioner's IEC, instructing them to respond to the compliant notice within two weeks. Respondents were ordered to issue a speaking order within four weeks. The petition was allowed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432950 The Court found that the suspension of the Importer Exporter Code (IEC) without proper procedure violated Section 8 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act. While the initial notice lacked specificity on grounds for suspension, a subsequent notice outlined the violations clearly. The Court directed the restoration of the petitioner's IEC, instructing them to respond to the compliant notice within two weeks. Respondents were ordered to issue a speaking order within four weeks. The petition was allowed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432950