<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306236</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of including condoms in the First Schedule to the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013, finding it in compliance with the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. However, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority&#039;s orders fixing the ceiling price for condoms were deemed illegal and unsustainable as they exceeded the authority granted by the DPCO, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306236</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of including condoms in the First Schedule to the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013, finding it in compliance with the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. However, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority&#039;s orders fixing the ceiling price for condoms were deemed illegal and unsustainable as they exceeded the authority granted by the DPCO, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>