<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1329 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority to proceed against the Appellant on an ex-parte basis due to proper service of notices and lack of appearance by the Corporate Debtor. The Section 9 application filed by the 2nd Respondent was deemed complete, following procedures, and meeting the threshold limit for unpaid operational debt. No pre-existing dispute was raised by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 20:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1329 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority to proceed against the Appellant on an ex-parte basis due to proper service of notices and lack of appearance by the Corporate Debtor. The Section 9 application filed by the 2nd Respondent was deemed complete, following procedures, and meeting the threshold limit for unpaid operational debt. No pre-existing dispute was raised by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>