<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1410 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306233</link>
    <description>The court addressed challenges to the revocation of a Customs Broker License and interpreted whether the timeline under Regulation 17 (7) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was mandatory. The court granted an interim stay on the revocation order pending further proceedings, considering the petitioner&#039;s prima facie case and existing stay on the license suspension by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 20:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1410 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306233</link>
      <description>The court addressed challenges to the revocation of a Customs Broker License and interpreted whether the timeline under Regulation 17 (7) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was mandatory. The court granted an interim stay on the revocation order pending further proceedings, considering the petitioner&#039;s prima facie case and existing stay on the license suspension by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>