<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 663 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order in an appeal against an assessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to transfer pricing adjustment. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to wait for the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s decision and the subsequent invalid transfer pricing order rendered the proceedings void. The Dispute Resolution Panel found the assessment order to be wrong and illegal, lacking a valid reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer during reassessment. As the assessee was not considered an &quot;eligible assessee,&quot; the Panel declined jurisdiction. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the unsustainability of the final assessment order without a valid Transfer Pricing Officer reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:33:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 663 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order in an appeal against an assessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to transfer pricing adjustment. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to wait for the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s decision and the subsequent invalid transfer pricing order rendered the proceedings void. The Dispute Resolution Panel found the assessment order to be wrong and illegal, lacking a valid reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer during reassessment. As the assessee was not considered an &quot;eligible assessee,&quot; the Panel declined jurisdiction. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the unsustainability of the final assessment order without a valid Transfer Pricing Officer reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>