<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31542</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the deduction of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, as the Assessee had properly written off the bad debts in its accounts. However, the issue of deducting remuneration without proof of services rendered by an individual remains unresolved, pending further examination by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31542</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the deduction of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, as the Assessee had properly written off the bad debts in its accounts. However, the issue of deducting remuneration without proof of services rendered by an individual remains unresolved, pending further examination by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>