<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the delayed adjudication of show cause notices, spanning over two decades, violated natural justice principles and procedural fairness. Citing legislative mandate under Section 11A(11) of the Excise Act, the Tribunal set aside the demands, deeming them contrary to the law. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory timelines in adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the delayed adjudication of show cause notices, spanning over two decades, violated natural justice principles and procedural fairness. Citing legislative mandate under Section 11A(11) of the Excise Act, the Tribunal set aside the demands, deeming them contrary to the law. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory timelines in adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>