<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</link>
    <description>Section 11A(11) of the Central Excise Act requires timely adjudication of show cause notices issued under Section 11A(4) or 11A(5), and an extraordinary delay of about twenty years breached that statutory mandate. The belated adjudication was therefore contrary to the prescribed limitation and could not be sustained, with the consequential duty demand also failing. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</link>
      <description>Section 11A(11) of the Central Excise Act requires timely adjudication of show cause notices issued under Section 11A(4) or 11A(5), and an extraordinary delay of about twenty years breached that statutory mandate. The belated adjudication was therefore contrary to the prescribed limitation and could not be sustained, with the consequential duty demand also failing. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>