<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections, and upheld the DRP&#039;s decision to delete the adjustment. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistency in applying the most appropriate method for transfer pricing analysis and the significance of reconciling prices in international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections, and upheld the DRP&#039;s decision to delete the adjustment. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistency in applying the most appropriate method for transfer pricing analysis and the significance of reconciling prices in international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>