<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 623 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432876</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that Section 115JB&#039;s MAT provisions do not apply to the assessee, a State Financial Corporation. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee does not qualify as a &quot;company&quot; under the relevant provisions. Additionally, adjustments made by the CPC were deemed procedurally invalid due to lack of prior intimation. Hence, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 623 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432876</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that Section 115JB&#039;s MAT provisions do not apply to the assessee, a State Financial Corporation. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee does not qualify as a &quot;company&quot; under the relevant provisions. Additionally, adjustments made by the CPC were deemed procedurally invalid due to lack of prior intimation. Hence, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>