<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 600 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432853</link>
    <description>An import allocation scheme tied to a judicially fixed ceiling must be administered only on the basis of production capacities existing on the specified cut-off date. Post-cut-off enhancement of a unit&#039;s capacity, even if later recognised by regulatory consent to operate, cannot be used to revise the inter se distribution or enlarge that unit&#039;s share of raw petroleum coke. DGFT public notices had to remain consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s ceiling and could not alter the underlying capacity base administratively. The allocation made by relying on enhanced post-cut-off capacity was therefore invalid, and the impugned allocation was set aside with directions to redraw the distribution in accordance with the court&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 600 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432853</link>
      <description>An import allocation scheme tied to a judicially fixed ceiling must be administered only on the basis of production capacities existing on the specified cut-off date. Post-cut-off enhancement of a unit&#039;s capacity, even if later recognised by regulatory consent to operate, cannot be used to revise the inter se distribution or enlarge that unit&#039;s share of raw petroleum coke. DGFT public notices had to remain consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s ceiling and could not alter the underlying capacity base administratively. The allocation made by relying on enhanced post-cut-off capacity was therefore invalid, and the impugned allocation was set aside with directions to redraw the distribution in accordance with the court&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>