<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 346 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31527</link>
    <description>The appellate authority set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for late payment of service tax, citing the lack of mala fide intention and confusion regarding tax laws. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering reasonable causes for payment delays and the need for a consistent approach in penalty imposition based on individual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 346 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31527</link>
      <description>The appellate authority set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for late payment of service tax, citing the lack of mala fide intention and confusion regarding tax laws. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering reasonable causes for payment delays and the need for a consistent approach in penalty imposition based on individual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>