<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</link>
    <description>The pending GST refund application was directed to be considered, processed and decided within four weeks, and the respondent was required to communicate the order to the applicant within five working days. The writ petition was thus disposed of on a time-bound direction for administrative action on the refund claim, without any adjudication on the merits of the refund entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</link>
      <description>The pending GST refund application was directed to be considered, processed and decided within four weeks, and the respondent was required to communicate the order to the applicant within five working days. The writ petition was thus disposed of on a time-bound direction for administrative action on the refund claim, without any adjudication on the merits of the refund entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>