<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</link>
    <description>HC Madras ruled on a pending GST refund application from 2019. The court directed the respondent to process and decide the refund claim within four weeks, emphasizing the need for prompt action. The judgment mandated communication of the decision within five working days, addressing the significant delay in handling the zero-rated sales refund application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</link>
      <description>HC Madras ruled on a pending GST refund application from 2019. The court directed the respondent to process and decide the refund claim within four weeks, emphasizing the need for prompt action. The judgment mandated communication of the decision within five working days, addressing the significant delay in handling the zero-rated sales refund application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>