<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 558 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432811</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite arguments regarding the violation of natural justice and delay in decision-making, the court relied on legal precedents to support its decision. The petitioners were granted liberty to pursue the alternative remedy as per the law, following the principle that statutory appeal remedies should be availed when provided by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 558 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432811</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite arguments regarding the violation of natural justice and delay in decision-making, the court relied on legal precedents to support its decision. The petitioners were granted liberty to pursue the alternative remedy as per the law, following the principle that statutory appeal remedies should be availed when provided by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>