https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306161 The Court found the petition under Article 32 to be an abuse of process due to seeking reliefs beyond its purview regarding control over Church properties. It clarified that mandamus cannot establish an independent Tribunal or direct a State to pass a law, as these fall outside its jurisdiction. Challenging a previous Supreme Court judgment through Article 32 was deemed impermissible, leading to the dismissal of the petition for lack of maintainability. The ruling underscores the restricted scope of relief under Article 32 and the inability to contest prior judgments through this avenue. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 21:11:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306161 The Court found the petition under Article 32 to be an abuse of process due to seeking reliefs beyond its purview regarding control over Church properties. It clarified that mandamus cannot establish an independent Tribunal or direct a State to pass a law, as these fall outside its jurisdiction. Challenging a previous Supreme Court judgment through Article 32 was deemed impermissible, leading to the dismissal of the petition for lack of maintainability. The ruling underscores the restricted scope of relief under Article 32 and the inability to contest prior judgments through this avenue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306161