<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 531 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is the rightful owner of the gold, supported by credible documentary evidence. The protective addition made by the AO was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for procedural fairness and transparency in the assessment process, aligning with the principles laid down by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 531 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is the rightful owner of the gold, supported by credible documentary evidence. The protective addition made by the AO was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for procedural fairness and transparency in the assessment process, aligning with the principles laid down by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>