<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 340 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31510</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT (A) order, rejecting the addition of unexplained cash credits and investment in a bus. The ITAT also found no basis to add unexplained loans and upheld its order without recorded reasons. The court dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial legal question arose from the case, thereby affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 340 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31510</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT (A) order, rejecting the addition of unexplained cash credits and investment in a bus. The ITAT also found no basis to add unexplained loans and upheld its order without recorded reasons. The court dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial legal question arose from the case, thereby affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>