<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 520 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432773</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs.5,25,114 and upholding Rs.74,886 under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the IT Act 1961. The decision stressed the significance of providing explanations for cash sources during demonetization and reconciling cash balances to substantiate claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:00:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 520 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432773</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs.5,25,114 and upholding Rs.74,886 under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the IT Act 1961. The decision stressed the significance of providing explanations for cash sources during demonetization and reconciling cash balances to substantiate claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>