<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 512 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432765</link>
    <description>Unimpeachable material showing that a former director had resigned long before the alleged company-law defaults can defeat criminal liability for those later defaults. The court noted that the accused had ceased to be a director in 1995, while the alleged non-compliance related to 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, and that prior regulatory material had already recorded no action against him after his cessation. On those facts, the allegations could not fasten responsibility for the company&#039;s affairs at the relevant time, and continuation of the proceedings would amount to abuse of process. The proceedings were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 512 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432765</link>
      <description>Unimpeachable material showing that a former director had resigned long before the alleged company-law defaults can defeat criminal liability for those later defaults. The court noted that the accused had ceased to be a director in 1995, while the alleged non-compliance related to 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, and that prior regulatory material had already recorded no action against him after his cessation. On those facts, the allegations could not fasten responsibility for the company&#039;s affairs at the relevant time, and continuation of the proceedings would amount to abuse of process. The proceedings were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>