https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432758 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming the demand attributed to input services used in clearance of exempted products under the 2004 Credit Rules. The appellant's approach of not taking credit for input services exclusively used for exempted services was deemed correct. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefit to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining separate records for dutiable and exempted goods/services and ruled in favor of the appellant based on their adherence to the rules and relevant case law. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:00:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432758 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming the demand attributed to input services used in clearance of exempted products under the 2004 Credit Rules. The appellant's approach of not taking credit for input services exclusively used for exempted services was deemed correct. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefit to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining separate records for dutiable and exempted goods/services and ruled in favor of the appellant based on their adherence to the rules and relevant case law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432758