<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1317 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306140</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply LIBOR + 2% interest rate on monthly closing balances of advances to overseas Subsidiaries/Associated Enterprises, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court affirmed that loans to AEs are international transactions subject to Arm&#039;s Length Price regulations, with interest at LIBOR + 2% considered arm&#039;s length. The Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach in previous rulings and the absence of comparable transactions led to the rejection of the TPO&#039;s benchmarking rate. The classification of loans as short-term working capital and the deletion of TPO&#039;s adjustment were supported, emphasizing the application of LIBOR + 2% for determining interest rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1317 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306140</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply LIBOR + 2% interest rate on monthly closing balances of advances to overseas Subsidiaries/Associated Enterprises, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court affirmed that loans to AEs are international transactions subject to Arm&#039;s Length Price regulations, with interest at LIBOR + 2% considered arm&#039;s length. The Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach in previous rulings and the absence of comparable transactions led to the rejection of the TPO&#039;s benchmarking rate. The classification of loans as short-term working capital and the deletion of TPO&#039;s adjustment were supported, emphasizing the application of LIBOR + 2% for determining interest rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>