<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1628 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306137</link>
    <description>The article notes that bundled technical know-how and advisory services under a consultancy arrangement could not be assigned a nil value merely because the authorities viewed the services as unnecessary or insufficiently beneficial; the transfer pricing adjustment was therefore unsustainable where TNMM could not be displaced without proper basis. It also states that disallowance under section 14A should, in the circumstances discussed, be confined to the amount of exempt dividend income actually earned. Two remaining controversies, concerning depreciation on intangible assets and merger expenses, were treated as requiring fresh factual examination and remand for re-adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1628 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306137</link>
      <description>The article notes that bundled technical know-how and advisory services under a consultancy arrangement could not be assigned a nil value merely because the authorities viewed the services as unnecessary or insufficiently beneficial; the transfer pricing adjustment was therefore unsustainable where TNMM could not be displaced without proper basis. It also states that disallowance under section 14A should, in the circumstances discussed, be confined to the amount of exempt dividend income actually earned. Two remaining controversies, concerning depreciation on intangible assets and merger expenses, were treated as requiring fresh factual examination and remand for re-adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>