<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 38 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31503</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the respondent was not liable for service tax for receiving taxable services from a non-resident without an office in India from 16.8.02 to 31.12.04. The decision was supported by precedent in Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs CCE, which established that the recipient of such services could not be held liable for service tax before 1.1.05.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 38 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31503</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the respondent was not liable for service tax for receiving taxable services from a non-resident without an office in India from 16.8.02 to 31.12.04. The decision was supported by precedent in Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs CCE, which established that the recipient of such services could not be held liable for service tax before 1.1.05.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>