<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CUSTOMS BROKER IS NOT LIABLE FOR WRONG VALUATION OF GOODS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 114 penalises persons whose acts or omissions render goods liable to confiscation, but the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations impose compliance duties without prescribing confiscation or penalty consequences; because there was no material showing the broker fixed or declared the export value or abetted undervaluation, penalty under Section 114 could not be sustained and the broker&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CUSTOMS BROKER IS NOT LIABLE FOR WRONG VALUATION OF GOODS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 114 penalises persons whose acts or omissions render goods liable to confiscation, but the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations impose compliance duties without prescribing confiscation or penalty consequences; because there was no material showing the broker fixed or declared the export value or abetted undervaluation, penalty under Section 114 could not be sustained and the broker&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>