https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432750 In a GST detention dispute involving goods in transit, the HC declined to examine the substantive allegations of mismatch in documents, alleged fraudulent registration, and transport without valid papers. It directed the appellant to approach the detaining authority with supporting records, required the matter to be considered after personal hearing, and ordered a speaking decision on merits in accordance with law. The Court also allowed protective covering of the goods to prevent deterioration pending reconsideration. The appeal was disposed of without adjudicating the legality of the detention order, leaving the merits open for determination by the competent authority. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432750 In a GST detention dispute involving goods in transit, the HC declined to examine the substantive allegations of mismatch in documents, alleged fraudulent registration, and transport without valid papers. It directed the appellant to approach the detaining authority with supporting records, required the matter to be considered after personal hearing, and ordered a speaking decision on merits in accordance with law. The Court also allowed protective covering of the goods to prevent deterioration pending reconsideration. The appeal was disposed of without adjudicating the legality of the detention order, leaving the merits open for determination by the competent authority. Case-Laws GST Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432750