https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306134 The appellant, a District and Sessions Judge, was denied an extension of service beyond 58 years by the Full Court of the High Court of Patna. Despite filing legal proceedings challenging the denial, including a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA), the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to subsequent events. Allegations against the Registrar General and officers of the Registry were found unwarranted, with the Court emphasizing transparency and accountability, particularly criticizing the appellant's counsel for refusing to disclose the source of a document. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306134 The appellant, a District and Sessions Judge, was denied an extension of service beyond 58 years by the Full Court of the High Court of Patna. Despite filing legal proceedings challenging the denial, including a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA), the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to subsequent events. Allegations against the Registrar General and officers of the Registry were found unwarranted, with the Court emphasizing transparency and accountability, particularly criticizing the appellant's counsel for refusing to disclose the source of a document. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306134