<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 487 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432740</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the delay in re-filing was condoned. The case focused on the validity of an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, related to unexplained credits in the books of account. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the assessee regarding the creditworthiness, identity, and genuineness of the investment to be satisfactory. Documents such as bank statements, PAN card copies, and income tax returns supported the source of funds, and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s report validated the share valuation. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that no substantial question of law was raised, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 487 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432740</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the delay in re-filing was condoned. The case focused on the validity of an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, related to unexplained credits in the books of account. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the assessee regarding the creditworthiness, identity, and genuineness of the investment to be satisfactory. Documents such as bank statements, PAN card copies, and income tax returns supported the source of funds, and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s report validated the share valuation. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that no substantial question of law was raised, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>