<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Denies Relief; Petitioner Delayed Court Action After Section 226(3) Notice on Tax Refund Dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67665</link>
    <description>Stay application - Refund along with up-to-date interest after adjusting 20% of the disputed demand - Petitioner was following-up with the department. According to us, that is not a good enough answer. Even after notice u/s 226(3) of the Act was issued, which was in September 2022, the petitioner did not take immediate steps to approach the court. - No relief - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:03:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Denies Relief; Petitioner Delayed Court Action After Section 226(3) Notice on Tax Refund Dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67665</link>
      <description>Stay application - Refund along with up-to-date interest after adjusting 20% of the disputed demand - Petitioner was following-up with the department. According to us, that is not a good enough answer. Even after notice u/s 226(3) of the Act was issued, which was in September 2022, the petitioner did not take immediate steps to approach the court. - No relief - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:03:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>