<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 461 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432714</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed with defects, leading to notices for rectification. Despite rectification, the early hearing application was not pursued, resulting in rejection. An application for restoration was denied, as the Tribunal emphasized online publication of orders and the appellant&#039;s responsibility to monitor proceedings. The rejection was based on the lack of valid grounds for recall, with the option to file a fresh early hearing application available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 461 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432714</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed with defects, leading to notices for rectification. Despite rectification, the early hearing application was not pursued, resulting in rejection. An application for restoration was denied, as the Tribunal emphasized online publication of orders and the appellant&#039;s responsibility to monitor proceedings. The rejection was based on the lack of valid grounds for recall, with the option to file a fresh early hearing application available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>