<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 455 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s direction, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the allegations of fraudulent trading and that the outstanding amount of Rs. 8.95 crores was validly due to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 455 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s direction, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the allegations of fraudulent trading and that the outstanding amount of Rs. 8.95 crores was validly due to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>