<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 454 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432707</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of a stock broking firm regarding the inclusion of NSDL &amp;amp; CSDL charges in the assessable value for service tax. The tribunal held that these charges were not taxable as they were statutory charges under SEBI Rules and did not fall under the definition of commission or brokerage. Additionally, demat charges were not considered banking or financial services and were also deemed non-taxable. The tribunal emphasized the importance of clear statutory provisions in determining the taxable value for service tax purposes, setting aside the original decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 454 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432707</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of a stock broking firm regarding the inclusion of NSDL &amp;amp; CSDL charges in the assessable value for service tax. The tribunal held that these charges were not taxable as they were statutory charges under SEBI Rules and did not fall under the definition of commission or brokerage. Additionally, demat charges were not considered banking or financial services and were also deemed non-taxable. The tribunal emphasized the importance of clear statutory provisions in determining the taxable value for service tax purposes, setting aside the original decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>