<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms Petitioner Eligible for Benefits Under SVLDR Scheme 2019, Rejects Department&#039;s Product Scope Argument.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67649</link>
    <description>Denial of the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme) - there is no question of the Petitioner’s product being outside the purview of the SVLDR Scheme read with the Fourth Schedule to the CE Act. The Court, therefore, rejects the plea of the Department that the Petitioner would be ineligible for the benefit of the SVLDR Scheme. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms Petitioner Eligible for Benefits Under SVLDR Scheme 2019, Rejects Department&#039;s Product Scope Argument.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67649</link>
      <description>Denial of the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme) - there is no question of the Petitioner’s product being outside the purview of the SVLDR Scheme read with the Fourth Schedule to the CE Act. The Court, therefore, rejects the plea of the Department that the Petitioner would be ineligible for the benefit of the SVLDR Scheme. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>