https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432704 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties for the period from July 2010 to October 2010. It held that the appellant's commercial production began in November 2010, and the seizure and confiscation of goods were improper. The penalties under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 and Rule 26 were also set aside, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432704 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties for the period from July 2010 to October 2010. It held that the appellant's commercial production began in November 2010, and the seizure and confiscation of goods were improper. The penalties under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 and Rule 26 were also set aside, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432704