<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 450 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432703</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal on the denial of credit for input services post Let export order and granted the appellant the right to choose the method of compliance for reversing the credit. The third issue regarding the invocation of the second proviso to Section 11AC(1) was not pursued and, therefore, not allowed. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 450 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432703</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal on the denial of credit for input services post Let export order and granted the appellant the right to choose the method of compliance for reversing the credit. The third issue regarding the invocation of the second proviso to Section 11AC(1) was not pursued and, therefore, not allowed. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>