https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306126 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the impugned order. It found that the authorities had jurisdiction to issue the show-cause notice and correctly classified the goods post-manufacture. Emphasizing the importance of statutory limitations, the court noted the reasonableness of the impugned order's findings and the distinction between appellate and writ proceedings. The petitioner's arguments lacked merit, leading to the affirmation of the impugned order. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:37:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306126 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the impugned order. It found that the authorities had jurisdiction to issue the show-cause notice and correctly classified the goods post-manufacture. Emphasizing the importance of statutory limitations, the court noted the reasonableness of the impugned order's findings and the distinction between appellate and writ proceedings. The petitioner's arguments lacked merit, leading to the affirmation of the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306126