https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31493 The appeals against the demand of service tax were dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the respondents, as owners of the dharma kanta, were not providing business auxiliary services as they were only involved in weighing goods and not in promoting, marketing, or selling goods belonging to clients. The Tribunal upheld the previous decision, stating that the respondents did not provide any incidental or auxiliary services related to the promotion, marketing, or sale of goods. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and the impugned orders were upheld. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31493 The appeals against the demand of service tax were dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the respondents, as owners of the dharma kanta, were not providing business auxiliary services as they were only involved in weighing goods and not in promoting, marketing, or selling goods belonging to clients. The Tribunal upheld the previous decision, stating that the respondents did not provide any incidental or auxiliary services related to the promotion, marketing, or sale of goods. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and the impugned orders were upheld. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31493