<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1131 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306127</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue/appellants, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court held that Section 115JB does not apply to banking companies and settled the issue of disallowance of depreciation on assets leased to others in favor of the assessee based on previous rulings. The matter concerning the treatment of investments shown as Stock in Trade was not pursued further as it was not pressed by the revenue during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1131 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306127</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue/appellants, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court held that Section 115JB does not apply to banking companies and settled the issue of disallowance of depreciation on assets leased to others in favor of the assessee based on previous rulings. The matter concerning the treatment of investments shown as Stock in Trade was not pursued further as it was not pressed by the revenue during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>