https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306120 Registered notice sent to the correct address and returned with endorsements showing non-claim or avoidance supported a presumption of deemed service, and the absence of a separate order for substituted service did not defeat that presumption. The Court also treated the reference to deemed service on fewer respondents as an inadvertent clerical error that did not affect validity. Because the earlier judgment had been decided on merits, recall was not the proper remedy; review alone would lie on limited grounds. The recall application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected, leaving the earlier judgment undisturbed. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:38:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306120 Registered notice sent to the correct address and returned with endorsements showing non-claim or avoidance supported a presumption of deemed service, and the absence of a separate order for substituted service did not defeat that presumption. The Court also treated the reference to deemed service on fewer respondents as an inadvertent clerical error that did not affect validity. Because the earlier judgment had been decided on merits, recall was not the proper remedy; review alone would lie on limited grounds. The recall application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected, leaving the earlier judgment undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306120