<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306119</link>
    <description>The Court held that the service of notice sent by registered post with acknowledgement card was valid under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. It was determined that the service through registered post met the necessary requirements, including correct postal addresses and proper dispatch. The Court also found that irregularities in service and failure to rebut the presumption of service did not warrant setting aside the ex-parte decree. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of merit in challenging the validity of the service of summons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:00:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306119</link>
      <description>The Court held that the service of notice sent by registered post with acknowledgement card was valid under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. It was determined that the service through registered post met the necessary requirements, including correct postal addresses and proper dispatch. The Court also found that irregularities in service and failure to rebut the presumption of service did not warrant setting aside the ex-parte decree. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of merit in challenging the validity of the service of summons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>