<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306114</link>
    <description>Financial assistance to schools does not by itself create an employer-employee relationship with the corporate management; absent a real master-servant nexus, no writ of mandamus lies for salary, dearness allowance or service benefits. The Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1981 did not authorise a court to compel the State to take over management where the statutory conditions for proprietary school recognition and financial responsibility were not met. A claim for equal pay and parity of service benefits also failed because Article 39(d) requires complete identity of duties, qualifications and conditions, which was not shown between teachers and clerical staff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306114</link>
      <description>Financial assistance to schools does not by itself create an employer-employee relationship with the corporate management; absent a real master-servant nexus, no writ of mandamus lies for salary, dearness allowance or service benefits. The Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1981 did not authorise a court to compel the State to take over management where the statutory conditions for proprietary school recognition and financial responsibility were not met. A claim for equal pay and parity of service benefits also failed because Article 39(d) requires complete identity of duties, qualifications and conditions, which was not shown between teachers and clerical staff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>