<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 269 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal concerning the computation of total receipts for commercial coaching services. It was held that the disputed amount voluntarily disclosed to the Income Tax department was not received from customers for taxable services. The total receipt amount was deemed subject to Service Tax, treated as inclusive of Service Tax. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant that total amounts received from customers should be treated as cum-tax, leading to the requantification of Service Tax and penalties in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 269 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal concerning the computation of total receipts for commercial coaching services. It was held that the disputed amount voluntarily disclosed to the Income Tax department was not received from customers for taxable services. The total receipt amount was deemed subject to Service Tax, treated as inclusive of Service Tax. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant that total amounts received from customers should be treated as cum-tax, leading to the requantification of Service Tax and penalties in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>