<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 430 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432683</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16. The Court held that the approval obtained from the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax was incorrect as it should have been obtained from the authority specified under section 151(ii) of the Act. The petition was allowed without costs, emphasizing the necessity of proper approval processes for such notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 430 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432683</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16. The Court held that the approval obtained from the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax was incorrect as it should have been obtained from the authority specified under section 151(ii) of the Act. The petition was allowed without costs, emphasizing the necessity of proper approval processes for such notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>