<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 424 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432677</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment for the year 2013-14 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it found that there was no failure on the petitioner&#039;s part to disclose necessary facts for assessment. The court held that the reasons for reopening lacked clarity on undisclosed material facts, leading to the unsustainable nature of the notice. The petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 424 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432677</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment for the year 2013-14 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it found that there was no failure on the petitioner&#039;s part to disclose necessary facts for assessment. The court held that the reasons for reopening lacked clarity on undisclosed material facts, leading to the unsustainable nature of the notice. The petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>