<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432675</link>
    <description>The court granted interim relief to the petitioner, subject to submitting legible copies of annexures. The court decided to hear and dispose of the writ petition without requiring a counter-affidavit. The petitioner&#039;s substantive prayers were granted, including quashing the Impugned Order, granting a stay on demand, directing refund, stopping further recovery, and expediting appeal disposal by the CIT (A). The court allowed the petitioner to move an application regarding surcharge recognition, directing the concerned authority to decide within three weeks. No precipitate action was permitted against the petitioner pending the decision, with a two-week implementation delay if adverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:44:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432675</link>
      <description>The court granted interim relief to the petitioner, subject to submitting legible copies of annexures. The court decided to hear and dispose of the writ petition without requiring a counter-affidavit. The petitioner&#039;s substantive prayers were granted, including quashing the Impugned Order, granting a stay on demand, directing refund, stopping further recovery, and expediting appeal disposal by the CIT (A). The court allowed the petitioner to move an application regarding surcharge recognition, directing the concerned authority to decide within three weeks. No precipitate action was permitted against the petitioner pending the decision, with a two-week implementation delay if adverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>