<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 403 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432656</link>
    <description>A right to distribute broadcast content, without transfer of copyright in the underlying work, is treated as a commercial distribution right and not royalty under the India-Mauritius tax treaty or section 9(1)(vi). The material also explains that a fixed place permanent establishment requires premises in India at the foreign enterprise&#039;s disposal, and a dependent agent permanent establishment requires authority to conclude contracts or comparable agency functions; on the facts discussed, neither existed. Where the Indian entity was remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no further profit attribution was warranted. The note further records that interest under section 234B remained chargeable on binding precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 403 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432656</link>
      <description>A right to distribute broadcast content, without transfer of copyright in the underlying work, is treated as a commercial distribution right and not royalty under the India-Mauritius tax treaty or section 9(1)(vi). The material also explains that a fixed place permanent establishment requires premises in India at the foreign enterprise&#039;s disposal, and a dependent agent permanent establishment requires authority to conclude contracts or comparable agency functions; on the facts discussed, neither existed. Where the Indian entity was remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no further profit attribution was warranted. The note further records that interest under section 234B remained chargeable on binding precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>