<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 390 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Reliance Mediaworks Ltd, in a dispute over tax liability on a revenue-sharing arrangement in the exhibition of cinematographic films. The Tribunal found that the entities involved in the arrangement were rendering services on a &#039;principal-to-principal&#039; basis, not as partners, and therefore, the tax liability fell on the constituent members based on the nature of the transaction. Citing relevant circulars and legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the tax authorities&#039; order and allowed the appeal, concluding that no service tax could be levied on the appellant under Business Support Service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 390 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Reliance Mediaworks Ltd, in a dispute over tax liability on a revenue-sharing arrangement in the exhibition of cinematographic films. The Tribunal found that the entities involved in the arrangement were rendering services on a &#039;principal-to-principal&#039; basis, not as partners, and therefore, the tax liability fell on the constituent members based on the nature of the transaction. Citing relevant circulars and legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the tax authorities&#039; order and allowed the appeal, concluding that no service tax could be levied on the appellant under Business Support Service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>